ABOUT THIS ISSUE

How this newsletter was synthesized?

Methodology

This newsletter is generated by an AI pipeline (leveraging Anthropic Sonnet 4.5 & Haiku 4.5) that processes the metadata and abstracts of every new arXiv HCI paper from the past week—138 this issue. Each paper is scored on three dimensions: Practice (applicability for practitioners), Research (scientific contribution), and Strategy (industry implications), with scores from 1-5. Papers passing threshold are grouped into topic clusters, and each cluster is summarized to capture what that body of research is exploring.

Selection Criteria

The pipeline builds a curated selection that balances high scores with topic diversity—and deliberately includes at least one 'contrarian' paper that challenges prevailing assumptions. This selection is then analyzed to identify key findings (patterns across multiple papers) and surprises (results that contradict conventional wisdom). A narrative synthesis ties the week's research together under a unifying frame.

Key Themes Discovered

Field Report: ai-interaction

Trust, Agency, and Harm in AI Interaction

This cluster examines how users navigate trust, autonomy, and psychological safety in AI-mediated interactions. Core tensions emerge: proactive AI assistance triggers self-threat and reduces adoption; explanations fail to improve understanding without user literacy; and collaborative workflows expose cognitive biases favoring algorithmic deference over critical judgment. Research spans emotional dynamics in AI companions, dark patterns in LLM interfaces, and the gap between individual AI adoption and organizational integration. The dominant concern is not capability but behavioral alignment—how system design, user psychology, and organizational culture jointly determine whether AI augments or undermines human agency.

1/10