ABOUT THIS ISSUE

How this newsletter was synthesized?

Methodology

This newsletter is generated by an AI pipeline (leveraging Anthropic Sonnet 4.5 & Haiku 4.5) that processes the metadata and abstracts of every new arXiv HCI paper from the past week—146 this issue. Each paper is scored on three dimensions: Practice (applicability for practitioners), Research (scientific contribution), and Strategy (industry implications), with scores from 1-5. Papers passing threshold are grouped into topic clusters, and each cluster is summarized to capture what that body of research is exploring.

Selection Criteria

The pipeline builds a curated selection that balances high scores with topic diversity—and deliberately includes at least one 'contrarian' paper that challenges prevailing assumptions. This selection is then analyzed to identify key findings (patterns across multiple papers) and surprises (results that contradict conventional wisdom). A narrative synthesis ties the week's research together under a unifying frame.

Key Themes Discovered

Field Report: ai-interaction

Trust, Alignment, and Behavioral Calibration

This cluster examines how humans interpret, trust, and adapt to AI systems in consequential interactions. Core tensions emerge: LLMs excel at technical tasks but fail behavioral alignment with domain experts; users misattribute AI feedback to human sources; chatbots create dependency loops in vulnerable populations. Research spans high-stakes domains (mental health, radiology, robotics) where system reliability depends not on accuracy alone but on transparent uncertainty communication, expert-validated behavior design, and user-centered interface affordances. The dominant question is not "what can AI do?" but "how do humans calibrate reliance on AI when stakes are real?"

1/10